Media Law: Recent Work

Parameswaran Subramanyam, a Tamil refugee, has won his libel claims against the Daily Mail and The Sun newspapers.  
 
In April 2009, Mr Subramanyam embarked on a 23-day hunger strike outside the Houses of Parliament as part of a long running demonstration by Tamils resident in UK to protest about the civil war in Sri Lanka. 
 
In October 2009, the Daily Mail published allegations that Mr Subramanyam had secretly been eating takeaway burgers throughout his hunger strike and caused the police to waste a fortune in public money.  The allegations were repeated by the Sun on its website.    
 
Four months after issuing court proceedings, both newspapers have now admitted in the High Court that the allegations were completely false and should never have been published.  They have both published full apologies to Mr Subramanyam, paid him £77,500 in libel damages as well as his legal costs.

Express Newspapers has apologised in the High Court to the Trustees of Interpal (a UK-based charity that provides relief and development aid to Palestinians in need) over an article published on 27 December 2009 concerning the terrorist attempt to blow up an airliner over the United States on Christmas Day 2009. The article falsely alleged that Interpal supported Hamas (which is designated as a terrorist organisation under UK anti-terrorism legislation) and that the charity and its Trustees thereby aid terrorism.
 
The newspaper published an apology on its website and has agreed to pay £60,000 damages to the Trustees, which they will apply to the charity's funds.

The settlement has been concluded of the complaint brought by Professor Robert Service and Dr Rachel Polonsky against Professor Orlando Figes of Birkbeck College, London over reviews of their works posted on the Amazon website. This remarkable story was given widespread coverage in the national press earlier in 2010 (see links below).

Professor Service and Dr Polonsky brought their complaint after Professor Figes circulated an email to colleagues denying that he was behind anonymous, scathing reviews of their books on Amazon and criticising them for suggesting he was involved.  Professor Figes’s wife then stated that it was her that had written the reviews.  However, a week later Professor Figes admitted that it was not his wife, but he, that was to blame.

As part of the settlement Professor Figes has circulated a full apology to colleagues in which, among other things, he accepts that his denial of responsibility was false and withdraws any adverse imputations that his email had conveyed against Professor Service and Dr Polonsky.  Professor Figes has also agreed to pay damages as well as the legal costs of the complaint.

Prince Radu of Romania has won his long-running libel claim against the editor and publisher of Royalty Monthly magazine. In the article, published on 17 September 2004, Royalty Monthly falsely alleged that Prince Radu was dishonestly claiming to have been granted a title, and that he was guilty of being an officer in the Securitate secret police. Royalty Monthly now accepts that these allegations were completely untrue and should never have been published.  As well as giving a full apology to Prince Radu in the High Court in London, Royalty Monthly has agreed to pay substantial damages to Prince Radu together with his legal costs.

Lalit Modi, former Chairman of the Indian Premier League, has issued proceedings for libel in the High Court in London against Giles Clarke, the Chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB).  Mr Modi complains of defamatory allegations made in an email sent by Mr Clarke on 2 May 2010 to Shashank Manohar, the president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and others.   In his email Mr Clarke alleged that Mr Modi was planning to  destroy world cricket by setting up a rebel league in contravention of ICC regulations.  Mr Modi utterly refutes Giles Clarke's claims and has made this clear in detailed submissions made to the BCCI on 31 May 2010.

Solicitor Scott Eason has settled his libel action against Rick Kordowski, brought over false allegations published about him on the website Solicitors from Hell.  Mr Kordowski has accepted the allegations are false, taken them down from his website and apologised to Mr Eason.

The Daily Telegraph has published a full apology and paid damages and legal costs to Sir Robert Atkins MEP over false allegations concerning his expenses claims.

News Group Newspapers has apologised to Dr Mohammed Asha over false allegations published in The Sun on 10 August 2009. The article complained of falsely alleged that there were very strong grounds to suspect that Dr Asha would be involved in the future in terrorist bomb plots and was, therefore, an ongoing threat to national security.  The newspaper has published an apology, agreed to pay Dr Asha £115,000 in compensation and his legal costs.

On 16 April, Magnus Boyd and Simon Singh were interviewed on BBC Radio 4's Today programme by James McNaughtie on the movement for libel refom generated by Singh's successful defence of the Claim against him by the British Chiropractic Association.

Express Newspapers has apologised in the High Court to the Trustees of the Ummah Welfare Trust (a UK charity providing emergency relief in developing countries) over an article published on 27 December 2009 that falsely claimed that the charity was linked to Anwar al Awlaki, said to be the spiritual leader of Al Qaeda and behind the 9/11 attacks and the Christmas Day Detroit aeroplane bomb plot. The article also falsely alleged that the charity had accepted donations in order to advance terrorism and had connections to Hamas. The newspaper has published a report of its apology on its website and has agreed to pay damages to the Trustees, which they will apply to the charity's funds.

Carter-Ruck Partner Alasdair Pepper will sit on a committee set up by The Master of the Rolls to examine the issue of so-called "super-injunctions".

The Racing Post has published an apology to well-known racehorse trainers Jim and Tom Best and their father Leon Best Snr in respect of an article published in June 2009 which falsely claimed they had been charged with serious criminal offences.  The Racing Post also  agreed to pay  Jim, Tom and Leon Best Snr damages and their legal costs.

The New Statesman has apologised to Daniel Hannan, the Conservative MEP for Southeast England, in respect of defamatory allegations published on its website on 18 September 2009. The New Statesman has also paid Mr Hannan damages together with his legal costs.

Boris Berezovsky, the well-known Russian businessman, has won £150,000 in libel damages against the Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company and Vladimir Terluk following a two week trial in the High Court.

On 3 March 2010, the Financial Times published a large feature on libel and privacy law, including numerous references to Carter-Ruck.

The Independent has retracted front-page allegations made about the leading commodities trader Trafigura.  The newspaper published a full correction both in the hard copy and online.

On 23 February, Partner Nigel Tait appeared on Radio 4's Law in Action programme commenting on recent developments in privacy law and "super-injunctions". Nigel Tait was also interviewed on 24 February on the World Service's Newshour programme regarding the Culture, Media and Sport Committee's report into press standards, privacy and libel.

Terms of settlement have been agreed in the long running libel proceedings brought by GE Healthcare against Henrik Thomsen, Professor of Radiology at Herlev hospital, Copenhagen. The parties have agreed the following press release.

Cameron Doley and Stevie Loughrey are acting for Jacqui Lait, Conservative MP for Beckenham, in her libel claim against the Evening Standard.